Direct evidence of Evolution
In case there was any doubt left in the "minds" of people who disagree with evolution, you now have direct experimental proof !
It's a neat read. But then again those who don't believe in evolution are so hopelessly lost they'd probably disagree with Jesus or Mohammed if they themselves told them! Even imaginary mystical beings can't overpower infinite human stupidity!
It's a neat read. But then again those who don't believe in evolution are so hopelessly lost they'd probably disagree with Jesus or Mohammed if they themselves told them! Even imaginary mystical beings can't overpower infinite human stupidity!
posted by Eddie | 1:50 AM
3 Comments:
Your right I should reserve the word proof for the math world. It is the strongest forseeable verification possible for the theory of evolution. But it is a direct demonstration of a specific case. That's as much as I can imagine is possible in the physical world (obviously the digital could do more in theory) so I guess it should be called a "demonstration of principle." But creationalists won't understand this point anyways...
What non-creationalists don't understand, apparently, is the difference between "microevolution" (intra-species mutation) and "macroevolution" (trans-species mutation).
We creationists certainly agree on the "micro-" level. Our point of contention is the "macro-" level.
Well it is a more complicated situation and harder to demonstrate. But think of this, 15000 years ago there were no dogs, only wolves. Today we have dogs.
Post a Comment
<< Home